Endgame
I am fond of a few superhero films, including «Batman»
of Tim Burton. I also have a high opinion of Sam Raimi’s «Spider-Man». As we
remember, in the late 2000s, Marvel started producing quite a high number of
superhero films, including cool «Iron Man» with Robert Downey Jr. Also Marvel
produced good «Thor».
Any moneymaking theme is milked until the full dry and
the same words could be applied to Marvel movies. The producers started
financing films about all superheroes and after some time quantity began to
dominate over quality. In opinion, the first failure was a reboot of «Spider-Man»
with Andrew Garfield, but then Marvel produced funny «Venom».
When I saw, that the last «Avengers» is a three-hour
film, I began experiencing doubt, because it is quite hard to make an
interesting 3-hour superhero film. The last «Avengers» were an exception, or not?
Well, not exactly. The film was slightly boring
because of the three-hour duration. I am not against long films, but in this
case the directors are making unnecessary long scenes and not packing them with
enough action, and the real action kicks in only in the third hour. Of course,
the second hour also have some action, but it was not entertaining enough and
you might feel a need for a few yawns.
The film’s atmosphere is also a bit fake. Thanos have
killed a lot of people and the mood is quite mourny, but it is a bit farcical. The
quotes from famous films, so well used in the previous parts, are also resemble
not-so-good self-repetition, especially the quotes from «Back to the Future,
Part II».
Nevertheless, the film has strong sides. I enjoyed a
few humorous moments, including the line of Thor the depressive alcoholic. Also,
on the third hour the real action starts kicking in and the end is quite good
and catchy, but you have to wait for it.
In closing, the authors haven’t finished «Avengers» on
a high note. I hope, that the authors would understand, that the superhero
theme is burned out, and they would take a few years break.
No comments:
Post a Comment